Discuss whether the undervalued yuan (RMB) is the only cause of China’s rising inflation and trade surplus with the US. [25] (Rephrased Economics Question)

In recent years, it has been argued that the undervalued renminbi (RMB / yuan) is the major cause of China’s burgeoning inflation and massive trade surplus vis-à-vis developed countries, especially the USA. From 2007-21012, economists worldwide argued that China should revalue the yuan.

Discuss whether “the undervalued yuan” is the only cause of China’s rising inflation and huge trade surplus with the USA. [25]

Introduction

China has often been accused by the West of using her fixed exchange rate to maintain an “undervalued yuan”, meaning that her currency (yuan, renminbi, RMB) is cheaper than it otherwise should be in a floating exchange rate, relative to other currencies. 

This Economics paper argues that having an undervalued currency encourages demand for Chinese exports, which could arguably lead to demand-pull inflation, whilst concomitantly causing imported inflation for China, as its imports from its trading partners are relatively more expensive. Hence, it can be strongly argued that China’s inflationary woes indeed stem in part from an undervalued yuan, and, to a large extent, the high demand for low-priced Chinese exports is responsible for China’s huge trade surplus.

Inflation

First and foremost, it has to be argued that China’s inflationary woes stem partly from the undervalued RMB. With a relatively undervalued RMB, Chinese goods appear cheaper relative to other countries’ goods, and this causes an increase in the demand for Chinese exports, in contradistinction to other countries’ domestically produced goods or even goods from other exporting countries. This is because with increased demand for Chinese exports, (X-M) increases, and since AD = C + I + G + (X-M), there arises demand-pull inflation. Inflation is defined as a persistent and sustained increase in the general price level, and demand-pull inflation is caused by rapid and persistent increases in AD.

On the cost-push side, the undervalued yuan may have made imported inflation a real possibility and thus may have pushed up the AS curve. This is because if China imports inputs or factors of production, especially and furthermore so if those natural resources are then used as inputs to produce exports, then this might cause inflation in China if these inputs rise in price. Given that the cheaper yuan makes other countries’ currencies look more expensive, this is a real possibility.

Inflation in China, on the other hand, is also caused by the rapid growth they experienced in recent times. There has been rising domestic consumption due to the rapidly expanding middle classes in China, and that would have raised C. At the same time, rising optimism about business prospects have led firms to undertake investments, thus raising I as well. Since AD = C + I + G + (X-M), it is clear that these increase AD. Hence, AD also shifts to the right, thus causing demand-pull inflation due to rapid domestic Chinese economic growth, which is not solely related to growth in exports.

Trade Surpluses

Secondly, the “undervalued yuan” can be blamed for the mounting trade surplus China has with its trading partners, predominantly America, since American consumers’ high demand for cheap Chinese goods caused the Chinese to sell massive amounts of goods to Americans. As China uses a fixed exchange rate regime, this balance of trade disequilibrium is not automatically corrected, unlike under a freely floating exchange rate regime. Concomitantly, prices of imports remain relatively high, from the Chinese perspective, since the yuan was kept low. This leads in theory to import expenditure being low, whilst export expenditure is high. Hence, the low value of the Chinese yuan will continue to encourage other countries to import cheap Chinese goods, and thus incur a growing trade deficit; on the other hand, China will, theoretically, continue to accumulate surpluses given the low value of the yuan. Hence, it seems that the criticisms of the undervalued yuan seem justified here.

Other Countries’ Declining Comparative Advantage

Nonetheless, the “undervalued yuan” cannot be the only cause of this huge trade surplus; America’s slowly declining comparative advantage, where comparative advantage refers to the relatively lower opportunity cost of a country in producing a good relative to other trading countries, in manufacturing has led to weakening US exports, whilst, on the other hand, it might be possible to argue that China has developed a new, dynamic comparative advantage in manufacturing, especially cheap and lower-end products. For instance, the American steel industry has been too reliant on protectionism for many years, and this has contributed to her mounting trade deficit, because it has become less export competitive, while the Chinese improved consistently over recent years. Hence, perhaps the trade surpluses are due to American weaknesses and Chinese strengths.

Conclusion

Thus, while it can be strongly argued that the “undervalued yuan” does indeed have a part to play in China’s rising inflation and huge trade surpluses, it cannot be considered the only cause of these problems, and China’s increasing prosperity, especially for the middle classes, her rising economic growth, and the falling productivity and comparative advantage of the developed nations who are her trade partners are realistic and relevant alternative explanations for the same phenomena. 

JC Economics Essays: Tutor's Comments - This Economics essay was actually written under examination conditions by a Chinese student. First, it has to be praised: the English is very well written and fluent, and the student has clearly got a very good understanding of the Chinese economy and a good knowledge of international economic events. Secondly, it has to be said that the quantity and quality of this Economics essay far exceed what I would have expected as an Economics tutor, because this was written under examination conditions and by someone whose native language is not English. This just goes to show that if one puts one heart into doing something, and tries one's best - one can achieve many great things in life. As an Economics tutor, seeing such work and effort in my students' Economics essays is one of the joys of teaching. If you were to write this essay, how would you approach it? Would the approach be similar or different? Thanks for reading and cheers. 

Discuss the extent to which globalisation has helped Singapore achieve its macroeconomic objectives. [25]

Discuss the extent to which globalisation has helped Singapore achieve its macroeconomic objectives. [25]

This paper discusses the extent to which globalisation has helped Singapore achieve its macroeconomic objectives. Globalisation refers to the integration of economies through greater flows of trade, capital, labour, and technology across international borders. Singapore’s four main macroeconomic objectives are high and stable economic growth, a low inflation rate, low unemployment, and a favourable balance of payments (BOP). To a large extent, globalisation has helped Singapore achieve its macroeconomic objectives; however, globalisation brings with it downsides which have to be properly mitigated.

Economic Growth

First, globalisation has helped Singapore attain actual economic growth through increased international trade. Actual growth means an actual increase in real Gross Domestic Product (GDP), a shift in Aggregate Demand (AD) to the right. An increase in net exports (X-M) to the rest of the world raises AD, which in turn leads to a more than proportionate increase in GDP via the multiplier effect. Singapore has relied heavily on exports for economic growth. In fact, net exports make up the largest component of Singapore’s GDP. Increasing actual growth also helps Singapore achieve full employment, or alternatively low unemployment.

Second, large amounts of foreign direct investment (FDI) have helped Singapore achieve potential economic growth. Potential growth is the increase in the economy’s potential capability to produce output. Transfers of physical capital, human capital, and technology from Multi-National Corporations (MNCs) have helped increase the Singapore economy’s productive capacity, and thus shifts Singapore’s long-run Aggregate Supply (LRAS) curve to the right, increasing her potential economic growth.

Third, Singapore has also benefited from increased labour flows across international borders. Importing foreign labour leads to an increase in Singapore’s labour which raises the economy’s productive capacity. This is a relatively efficient and cost-effective way of increasing potential growth.

Low Inflation

Fourth, globalisation has helped Singapore keep inflation low. Inflation is defined as a persistent and sustained increase in the general price level, and it is generally seen as a problem. By importing raw materials from other countries at low prices, Singapore has been able to lower her costs of production which translates to lower prices for final products. Importing necessities and other finished products helps keep the general price level down. Also, globalisation increases the Singapore economy’s productive capacity which lowers prices. This is reflected by a rightward shift of the Long Run Aggregate Supply (LRAS) curve, which increases Singapore’s productive capacity in the long run, and concomitantly lowers prices and prevents cost-push inflation.

Low Unemployment

Fifth, globalisation helps to keep Singapore’s unemployment low. Increased export levels shifts AD to the right which in turn leads to higher equilibrium national output. This means that actual growth occurs, which shifts AD towards the full employment level, which lowers unemployment.

BOP

Finally, Singapore is able to have a positive net-export position by importing cheaper raw materials from abroad and exporting high value-added products. For example, Singapore imports crude oil from abroad, refines the oil, and then exports it to different countries. Because the value of Singapore’s exports exceeds the value of her imports, she has a current account surplus, which could translate into a BOP surplus, assuming the deficit in the financial or current accounts are not huge.

Downsides of Globalisation

Yet, despite all its apparent benefits, globalisation has some downsides which could possibly derail Singapore’s macroeconomic aims.

First, Singapore’s dependence on exports makes her vulnerable to negative economic conditions in other countries. If one of Singapore’s trading partners were to experience a recession, demand for her exports would fall. This reduces AD which leads to lower equilibrium national output. Thus, the Singapore economy is susceptible to demand shocks. For example, Singapore’s GDP decreased during the financial crisis of 2007/2008. Thus, while globalisation might confer growth, it also means that same growth could potentially be more volatile.

Second, while globalisation gives Singapore a bigger market for her exports, it also means that she could face more competition. Developing countries, like China, are catching up quickly. Singapore has already lost her comparative advantage in low- to medium-end manufacturing to rapidly industrialising countries. If exports decrease due to competition from low-cost countries, it will result in a fall in AD, which would lead to a drop in output. Over the years, Singapore has had to move up to higher value-added goods and services like biomedical or financial services in order to remain competitive.

Third, increases in Singapore’s productive capacity brought about by globalisation might not be permanent because she is highly reliant on MNCs which are by nature internationally mobile. They could shift operations to a lower-cost location, taking capital with them. There is also no guarantee that Singapore’s “foreign talent” will stay in the country for the long term. Furthermore, importing foreigners to increase Singapore’s labour is also unsustainable in the long term given Singapore’s small land size because the influx of foreigners, perceived to be competing with Singaporeans for jobs and space, has become a major source of political and social discontentment and political acceptability is a major issue. Thus, potential growth might be illusory and fraught with many potential political perils.

Fourth, if the Singapore economy is already operating at or near full employment, then a rise in AD due to increased exports could possibly and realistically lead to demand-pull inflation. Singapore’s persistently low unemployment rate suggests that her economy is operating at close to full employment already. Thus, inflation could be a potential problem.

Fifth, importing raw materials from abroad also leaves Singapore vulnerable to cost-push inflation, more specially imported inflation. For example, Singapore was affected by the rise in oil prices due to political uprisings in the Middle East. Hence, Singapore is vulnerable to supply shocks.   

Sixth, should Singapore lose export competitiveness, (X-M) will become negative which would mean a current account deficit and a likely BOP deficit. Weak demand for exports would result in a depreciation of the Singapore dollar which would increase the price of imports. A depreciation of the Singapore dollar is likely to be inflationary given Singapore’s dependence on imported raw materials, and because it becomes more expensive to buy imported inputs which Singapore needs to produce goods. A deficit in the BOP also means a decline in the country’s foreign reserves which means that if Singapore has few foreign reserves, her currency will be vulnerable to speculative attacks.

Seventh, globalisation could also potentially be harmful for employment. Singapore’s heavy reliance on exports means that she will experience high cyclical unemployment should her major trading partners enter recessions. Perhaps, even more worrying is the increase in structural unemployment because lower-skilled workers could find their jobs being outsourced. Even if their work cannot be easily shifted abroad, they face competition from foreign workers willing to work longer hours and at lower wages. Concomitantly, there is a shortage of workers able to take on high-skilled jobs created by the global economy. As such, Singapore has had to import “foreign talent” to fill this gap. Therefore there are many negative implications for the labour market.

Conclusions

In the final analysis, despite many drawbacks, globalisation has been largely beneficial for Singapore. This is mainly due to the way in which the government has managed to tap into opportunities offered by a globalised world. For example, by providing necessary infrastructure, low tax rates, and a highly-skilled workforce, the government created conditions conducive for international trade and economic growth. At the same time, the government has been able to mitigate some of globalisation’s downsides through her economic policies. Singapore could and does use exchange rate policy. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has the discretion to allow the Singapore dollar to appreciate in order to mitigate the inflationary effect of rising prices. Hence, to a large extent, globalisation has helped Singapore achieve its macroeconomic objectives; however, globalisation also brings with it several downsides which have to be properly managed.

JC Economics Essays: Tutor's Comments - This paper was modified and amended from one of the Economics essays written by my friend and classmate from NIE (National Institute of Education). After NIE, he became an Economics tutor at Raffles Institution (the JC section). [Special thanks and acknowledgements to my classmate's contribution.] This Economics essay is about globalisation and the impacts on Singapore's macroeconomic goals and aims; it also discussed policy options and methods to tackle impacts. There are many other globalisation and Singapore economy Economics questions and answers on my site here; do take your time here to explore and read, review, and study the other questions and answers. Compare and contrast them; think through them as well. Alright, here it is time to do the usual tutor's exercise once again: imagining that you are an Economics tutor, examining and marking this paper, what would you look out for? What would you consider a valid, reasonable, nuanced, and balanced argument or point? As an Economics tutor, how would you grade this paper, and why? Thinking through these processes will help you in writing better and better Economics essays, and improve your understanding and knowledge of this interesting and exciting subject. Thanks for reading and cheers!

(b) "Fiscal policy works best to achieve price stability in a small and open economy like Singapore." To what extent do you agree with this assertion? [17]

(b) "Fiscal policy works best to achieve price stability in a small and open economy like Singapore." To what extent do you agree with this assertion?

Inflation brings about some adverse effects to the economy and hence it is important for governments to implement policies to curb inflation. The policies used would differ according to the type of inflation as well as the nature of the economy. This paper discusses if fiscal policy works best to achieve price stability in a small and open economy, and uses Singapore as a case study in particular. First, it should be noted that Singapore is a small and open economy with no natural resources, relying heavily on trade, international capital flows, and foreign direct investments to drive growth. This paper argues that fiscal policy can be used, but its impacts are massively limited given Singapore’s context.

What is fiscal policy?

Fiscal policy refers to the manipulation of government expenditure and taxation to achieve macroeconomic goals. A contractionary fiscal policy could be used to curb inflation. Government expenditure could be reduced or taxation could be increased. With a lower government expenditure, this would translate to a lower aggregate demand (AD) which consists of AD = Consumption + Government expenditure + Investment + Net Exports, or AD = C + I + G + (X-M).

Through the multiplier process, a fall in G would lead to a multiple fall in AD. With a fall in AD, firms would accumulate inventories and this would be a signal to reduce production and output. Firms will reduce their number of workers hence resulting in a fall in output and a rise in unemployment and a fall in national income. With a fall in household incomes, there is a fall in spending and hence through the multiplier process, this would result in a contractionary effect on the economy. Hence, AD would shift to the left as shown, resulting in a fall in the general price level.

With higher taxes such as income taxes, this would reduce the disposable incomes of consumers and hence this would also reduce consumption expenditure, shifting the AD curve to the left, and, hence, also resulting in a fall in the general price level.

Limitations of Fiscal Policy in Singapore’s Context

However, the effectiveness of fiscal policy would depend on the size of the multiplier. In the case of Singapore, the size of the multiplier is small due to the high marginal propensities to save and import. This is firstly due to compulsory savings such as the Central Provident Fund (CPF), and, secondly, a high marginal propensity to import, among other factors. Because Singapore is a small and open economy that relies heavily on foreign trade, there would be high leakages from the economy. Also, it would also be difficult to reduce government expenditure for long-term, major projects. Increasing personal income tax could also result in a disincentive to work and a higher corporate tax could drive businesses away from Singapore.

Other Possible Solutions

On the other hand, the Singapore government can also use contractionary monetary policies (in Singapore’s case, an exchange rate policy), or supply-side policies instead to tackle inflation, rather than just fiscal policy.

Monetary Policy, in Singapore’s Context

Monetary policy refers to the use of interest rates to achieve macroeconomic objectives. In Singapore’s case, her monetary policy is tied to exchange rates, and Singapore uses a form of exchange rate policy because Singapore is dependent on external demand. Therefore, it is more effective to control exports and imports in Singapore’s context. Hence, the exchange rate is used as a tool of monetary policy in Singapore instead.

In Singapore, a managed float system is adopted where the Singapore dollar is allowed to fluctuate within a band against a basket of currencies of her trade partners. The central bank will then intervene in the foreign exchange market to move the exchange rate to a desired level by buying up or selling the Singapore dollar using her foreign reserves, when the currency level approaches the bands. For instance, to curb inflation, the Singapore central bank (the MAS) could buy up the Singapore dollar, resulting in an appreciation of the Singapore dollar. This appreciation of the Singapore dollar would lead to a fall in the price of imports in terms of Singapore dollars. This would lead to a lower cost of living as the price of imported products would be lower. With a lack of natural resources, Singapore depends heavily on imports as inputs to manufacture our exports. Therefore, the fall in the price of imports would lead to a fall in the cost of production.

The lower price of imports would also mean that consumers switch away from local goods and purchase more imports instead, assuming they are substitutes. With an appreciation of the Singapore dollar, this would mean that Singapore’s exports are more expensive in foreign currency terms and hence less price-competitive. Assuming demand for exports to be price-elastic, this would lead to a more than proportionate fall in quantity demanded of exports from Singapore. If the Marshall-Lerner condition holds, this would lead to a fall in net exports and hence a fall in AD. The AD curve would shift to the left, resulting in a fall in the general price level, ceteris paribus.

Limitations of Singapore’s Exchange Rate Policy

However, there are limitations to the effectiveness of Singapore’s exchange rate policy. Intervention in the foreign exchange market to generate an appreciation of the currency would require Singapore to maintain significant reserves. A fall in export earnings through an appreciation of the dollar would also lead to a worsening of the current account.

On the other hand, besides fiscal and monetary policies, the Singapore government could also use supply-side policies to tackle both demand-pull and cost-push inflation. With supply-side policies, the aggregate supply (AS) could be increased through labour retraining and education. By increasing the productivity of workers, in the long run, the cost of production would fall, resulting in a rightward shift of the LRAS curve, leading to a fall in the general price level, ceteris paribus. Cost-push inflation can also be curbed using wage and income policies. For instance, a flexible wage structure would enable wages to be adjusted downwards. In Singapore, the National Wages Council (NWC) recommends the level of wage increases. This could control labour costs and ensure that wage increases do not outstrip productivity increases.

However, supply-side policies would not work effectively if AD continues to increase. Therefore, there is a need to use both contractionary fiscal or monetary policy to reduce AD to reduce the upward pressure on prices. In the long run, supply-side policies are important to curb inflation.

Conclusions

In concluding, it should be mentioned there could also be considerable time lags involved in the implementation of policies. It takes time for policymakers to gather data. There could also be implementation lags due to the time taken to implement suitable policies. Once policies are implemented, there could also be impact lags as it takes time for policies to take effect. Also, due to the characteristics of the Singapore economy, it is arguably better to adopt contractionary monetary policy using exchange rates to curb inflation, as Singapore’s monetary policy is in the form of exchange rate policy. This poses a tricky problem, in that, with a small multiplier in Singapore’s context, the effectiveness of fiscal policy is limited, yet the benefits of supply-side policies might only be reaped in the long run. However, it should also be noted that curbing inflation could lead to a trade-off with another macroeconomic objective of unemployment. By curbing inflation, a fall in national output will occur and that might lead to an increase in unemployment. In the final analysis, fiscal policy is only one of many solutions and its impact is massively limited in Singapore, and as such as plethora of policies should be used instead of one single policy.

JC Economics Essays: Tutor's Comments - This paper was written by an Economics tutor friend of mine, who was my former classmate at the NIE (National Institute of Education), doing PGDE (Postgraduate Diploma in Education, JC, Economics specialisation). For part (a) of this question, see the suggested "model" Economics answer why low inflation is an important macroeconomic aim of the Singapore government.  My usual tutor's comments and questions apply here to this essay: what do you like about this paper, and what have you learnt here? Also, what have you studied that is different or similar to what is written in this Economics paper? Using your knowledge of macroeconomics, what diagram must you use here to explain the words? Remember, although this was written under simulated examination conditions by an Economics tutor, you can always think of other ways to improve it, refine it, and make it better suit the context. Also remember that you should know how and when to apply your Economics concepts and theories, rather than just merely memorising and regurgitating. Be sure to think hard, clearly, and properly when writing your Economics essays, especially during examination conditions. Thanks for reading, and cheers!

(a) Explain why low inflation is an important macroeconomic aim of the Singapore government. [8]

(a) Explain why low inflation is an important macroeconomic aim of the Singapore government. [8]

Inflation is defined as a sustained and persistent increase in the general price level. There are different possible causes of inflation, such as demand-pull or cost-push inflation. According to economists, a generally low inflation rate of 2 to 3% is optimal for an economy; however, hyperinflation results in adverse internal and external effects on an economy. Therefore, price stability is considered one of the important, major macroeconomic aims of any government, and Singapore is not an exception.

Internal Effects

There are adverse internal effects on an economy due to inflation. First, there could be an increase in “menu costs” as businesses would have to change price lists on their menus and catalogues often when inflation occurs, therefore incurring high transaction costs. Inflation could also result in “shoe-leather costs”, for instance, when firms frequently move money in and out of financial institutions to get the highest possible returns. Hence, high transaction costs could be an internal problem generated by inflation.

Secondly, inflation could also lead to a redistribution of income. Fixed income earners would suffer as the real value of their income would decrease due to inflation. For instance, pensioners or people on fixed wages would suffer due to inflation as their incomes would be able to buy less goods and services. Variable income earners, such as insurance agents or property agents, might not suffer that much because their incomes could increase due to inflation. Simultaneously, inflation would reduce the real value of debt. Hence, debtors would gain while creditors would lose in terms of purchasing power. The amount of the debt repaid by the borrower would have a smaller purchasing power due to inflation. Hence, a redistribution of income in favour of variable wage earners and debtors would occur.

Third, inflation damages investment. This is because the real value of savings will fall and people might be inclined to consume and spend instead of saving. This fall in savings would reduce the amount of funds available for investment, hence increasing borrowing costs (interest rates would rise as a result). Inflation also creates uncertainty as it is difficult for businesses to predict costs and revenues, profits, and losses. This would lead to a fall in investment, which would limit the future economic growth of the economy as well as the productive capacity of the country.

External Effects

When it comes to the foreign sector, inflation also has adverse effects. Inflation could negatively affect the competitiveness of a country’s exports. With higher inflation, a country’s exports would become relatively more expensive compared to goods from other countries. Assuming that the demand for Singapore’s exports is price-elastic, this would mean a larger than proportionate fall in the quantity demanded of exports when Singapore’s exports are priced higher relative to other countries due to the effects of inflation. Furthermore, with a higher relative rate of inflation as compared to other countries, this would mean that domestically-produced goods are relatively more expensive as compared to imports. Consumers would then switch from locally-produced goods to purchasing imports instead, assuming these are close substitutes. Therefore, import expenditure would also increase.

The Balance of Payments (BOP) would therefore be affected. For a small and open economy like Singapore, which depends on exports to drive economic growth, inflation could greatly worsen the country’s current account and thus worsen the BOP, assuming the capital/financial account remains unchanged. As a small economy with no natural resources, Singapore is dependent on imports of raw materials. Therefore, this makes Singapore susceptible to imported inflation, where the rising prices of such imports would lead to a higher cost of production, hence leading to a spiral of higher prices. Due to the high import content of Singapore’s exports, this could lead to a higher price of Singapore’s exports, hence adversely affecting export competitiveness.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the higher the rate of inflation, the greater the adverse effects on the country, be it internal or external effects. There are many different policies that the Singapore government can potentially use to curb inflation, such as fiscal policy, monetary policy, and supply-side policies.

JC Economics Essays: Tutor's Comments - This is part (a) of a two part Economics examination question set by an Economics tutor who was one of my classmates at NIE (National Institute of Education), where we did the PGDE (Postgrad Diploma in Education) for Economics. She kindly allowed me to modify her essay to fit this post. However, despite the fact this Economics essay was written by an Economics tutor, under simulated examination conditions, the question still remains: how can I improve on this work? Now, try a little more "feeling-based" or even "emotion-based" questions - what do I feel is correct about this Economics paper? what do I feel is right about this paper? is it just right in length? does it address the question? and so on. You can get a right gut feel about an Economics paper if you have reviewed many related Economics questions and gotten a feel of what a correct answer will or should look like. On my Economics site here, I have many other related questions - do explore them and see the comments that I have given to my students, other fellow Economics tutors, and to professional Economics paper writers. Thanks for reading and cheers! 

Discuss the effectiveness of government policies that could be used to tackle China’s inflation. [25] (rephrased Economics question)

“In 2003, China achieved an impressive growth rate of about 9%. Domestic consumption and investment formed the dominant source of her growth, and her inflation rate was above 5%. The economy was overheated.”

Adapted from The Straits Times, 2004

Discuss the effectiveness of government policies that could be used to deal with China’s ‘overheated economy’. [25]

Introduction

China is facing massive demand-pull inflation because of her rapid actual economic growth in recent years. Inflation can be defined as a persistent and sustained increase in the general price level, and can be classified as demand-pull or cost-push. In the context of China, because domestic consumption and investment forms the dominant source of China’s actual economic growth, the likely cause of China’s “overheated economy” is demand-pull inflation, which has to be countered using either demand-management or supply-side policies, or a combination of such measures by the Chinese government. This paper discusses contractionary demand-management policies, such as fiscal and monetary policies, and supply-side policies, in China’s context, and discusses the effectiveness of the suggested policies.

Demand-Pull Inflation

Insert Economics diagram here. What Economics diagram should go here?

In the diagram above, it is clear that increases in consumption (C) and investment (I) have led aggregate demand (AD) to shift to the right, which constitutes in this case actual economic growth, and thus inflation has resulted because the economy is near the full employment level. With a burgeoning middle class in China wanting to spend on consumer goods and other luxuries, and with domestic and foreign firms wanting to capitalise on the rising middle class in China, there has been a huge increase in AD. These collectively lead to demand-pull inflation because AD = C + I + G + (X-M), and therefore there is a need for the Chinese government to utilise either contractionary demand-management policies or increase the AS through supply-side policies.

Effectiveness of Government Policies

In the short run, contractionary demand management policies such as fiscal policy, monetary policy, or exchange rate policy can be used, to shift AD to the left and thus reduce inflationary pressures. In the longer term, supply-side policies can be used to increase the AS and thus reduce inflationary pressures.

What is the effectiveness of demand-side policies in China’s context? First and foremost, it is clear that any contractionary demand-side policy will reduce AD and tackle the problem directly. For instance, fiscal policy dictates that government spending should be reduced or taxes raised, and this would shift AD to the left, ameliorating inflationary pressures. Monetary policy used in this context would raise interest rates, reducing C and I because borrowing costs have increased, and therefore AD would also shift to the left. Appreciating the currency or revaluing the country’s currency would make exports look relatively expensive whilst imports look relatively cheaper, thus shifting AD to the left as well, directly addressing demand-pull inflation. In China’s case, a combination of fiscal policy and revaluation would make sense by reducing AD, directly addressing the issue.

What is the effectiveness of supply-side policies in China’s context? There are many supply-side measures that can be taken, for instance improving the efficiency of the labour market, via reducing frictional unemployment; increasing human capital training and development via training, retraining, and upgrading; and increasing labour productivity through capital and technological increases. These measures would be effective in the long run when AS shifts to the right and thus reduces the general price level in the intermediate and long term.

Ineffectiveness of Government Policies

On the other hand, the Chinese government has to be aware of possible limitations of such policies. First, contractionary fiscal policy might lead to unemployment and political problems if Chinese State Owned Enterprises laid off staff or if military spending were to be cut. Rising income taxes could hinder productivity and labour incentives because people might not work as hard. Corporate taxes, when raised, might affect the profitability of firms. These might lead to unemployment or lower actual economic growth.

Secondly, monetary policy could be highly ineffective in China’s case. This could be due to a variety of reasons. First, if business confidence is high, increasing interest rates would not dampen consumption and investment much. Secondly, China operates a fixed exchange rate and therefore the economic “trilemma” should apply to China. According to theory, a country cannot have free flowing capital, a fixed exchange rate, and yet pursue monetary policy using interest rates, because of the impossible economic “trilemma”. Thus, it is more likely that China uses exchange rate policy rather than depending mainly on interest rates.

Thirdly, supply-side policies operate in the long run but inflation affects China now. Furthermore, supply-side policies operate indirectly rather than tackling the root of the problem which is demand-pull inflation, which affects AD. Also, the Chinese government would have to invest in costly, expensive, and difficult long-term training, retraining, and upgrading for the workforce, and all this spending would have opportunity costs in terms of healthcare, defence, and education.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the Chinese government can use fiscal, monetary, or exchange rate policies in conjunction with longer term supply-side policies to tackle demand-pull inflation. However, multiple management policies would probably have to be implemented in order to successfully counteract the “overheated economy”. Also, there are trade-offs in that an excessive handling of inflation could lead to unemployment and slower actual economic growth, and governments should be aware of the trade-offs and their implications.

JC Economics Essays – Tutor's Commentary: The above Economics essay is on the interesting and current topic of inflation in China and government macroeconomic policies that could tackle this inflation. Instead of me telling you the grade that this paper would get – instead, let’s do another thinking exercise. Put yourself into the role of an Economics examiner looking at this piece of work. Once again, think about how your Economics tutors in Junior College, or university, for that matter, would rate this essay. Try to put yourself into your Economics tutor’s shoes. What would he or she say, and why? Also, try another exercise: try to draw out the diagram that would have been in this post if I had been less of a luddite and more of a techie. What would the diagram be, and why? Hint: you might want to use an AD-AS diagram - how would it look like? Thanks for reading and cheers. 

Analyse the impact of FTAs on the Singapore economy and assess the extent to which the impact of FTAs has been positive. [25m]

Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) are highways that connect Singapore to major economies and markets. With FTAs, Singapore-based exporters stand to enjoy many benefits like tariff concessions, preferential access to certain sectors, and faster entry into markets.

Analyse the impact of FTAs on the Singapore economy and assess the extent to which the impact of FTAs has been positive. [25m]

Note: The original essay was edited two-fold - first, to fit into this JC Economics Essay blog post; second, to remove diagrams/graphics. Hence it is entirely in verbal (English) form. 

A Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is a legally-binding agreement to liberalise trade and bring about closer economic integration between member countries. FTAs aim to remove barriers to trade and investment and create a free flow of goods, services, investment, and people. Under a FTA, member countries provide each other with favourable treatment for goods, services, and investment. Such favourable treatments include reduced tariffs, easier access to markets, and opening up of various sectors for investment opportunities. Thus, FTAs help to foster and facilitate the flow of trade and investment between Singapore and its trading partners with the aim of achieving economic growth and development. FTAs bring about both positive and negative impacts on the Singapore economy. However, the government has implemented policies to mitigate these negative impacts and the overall impact of FTAs on the Singapore economy is largely positive.

The Singapore economy is open to the world, in trade and investment. This openness to trade is a necessity because of its small size and lack of natural resources.

Figure 1 illustrates the effect of a tariff on imports. The original import expenditure for country A is shown by area Oaeq0, the price of imports is Oa and the quantity of imports is Oq0. For a country with price-elastic demand for imports, when the tariff is imposed, the price of imports rises to Ob and the quantity of imports fall to Oq1. Import expenditure is represented by area Obfq1. There is a reduction in import expenditure as the fall in quantity demanded of imports is greater than the rise in price of imports. For a country with price-inelastic demand for imports, when the tariff is imposed, the price of imports rises to Oc and the quantity of imports fall to Oq2. Import expenditure is represented by area Ocdq2. There is an increase in import expenditure as the fall in quantity demanded of imports is less than the increase in price of imports.

This illustrates the positive impact of free trade on the Singapore economy and is one of the key reasons why Singapore campaigns actively for the removal of tariffs and the setting up of FTAs. It has a relatively price-inelastic demand for imports since it has no natural resources and has to import both food as well as inputs for production. Imposing tariffs on such goods will have more adverse effects for its economy than gains.

On the export side, domestic producers in Singapore gain from an enlarged export market. Thus, they are able to reap internal economies of scale and earn greater export revenue. In addition, the reduction, or removal, of tariffs results in cheaper exports, which will lead to an increase in export demand and revenue. The increase in net exports increases aggregate demand and in turn increases national income, employment, and short-run growth if the economy is operating below full employment. On the other hand, if the economy is near or at full employment, the boost of net exports might lead to demand-pull inflation.

The other benefit that FTAs bring to the Singapore economy is that it allows countries to specialise in producing goods in which they have a comparative advantage in to a greater extent. Comparative advantage is the idea that relative opportunity costs of production must be taken into account when trading between countries. Consumers benefit from lower-priced goods, as Singapore’s trading partners are able to produce these goods more efficiently due to their comparative advantage. Also, there is both a greater variety of goods available and better quality of products. The removal of tariffs means that domestic producers face greater competition from foreign producers, which will boost the efficiency of domestic production and the quality of products.

Lastly, Singapore benefits from greater foreign direct investment. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) refers to long-term capital inflows, which typically takes the form of a Multinational Corporation (MNC) investing in an enterprise that is outside the economy of the MNC. The greater inflow of capital will have a positive impact on the Balance of Payment (BOP), creating a surplus in the BOP. Foreign direct investment will also result in an increase in capital accumulation, which increases the productive capacity of the economy and short-run economic growth. In addition, the diffusion of technology from the MNCs to domestic producers will increase the level of productivity and lead to long-run economic growth.

On the other hand, FTAs bring about negative impacts on the Singapore economy. First, structural unemployment arises in industries that are in direct competition with other lower-cost trading partners due to a loss of comparative advantage.  There will be a decline in production levels and employment in some of Singapore’s sectors such as manufacturing. This results in structural unemployment, as these workers are not equipped with the skills required to work in the newly-created sectors. In addition, new technology increases the importance on skills and substitutes for relatively low-skill inputs. Technology replaces low-skilled jobs, exacerbating the problem of unemployment.

Second, FTAs cause member countries to become more vulnerable to external events. FTAs foster closer trade links among member countries, and as a result increases the interdependence of their economies. This means that a recession in one country may quickly spread to other countries, which are its trading partners, an effect known as the “contagion effect”. In the case of Singapore, higher reliance on imports makes the economy more vulnerable to the threat of imported inflation, while reliance on exports to drive economic growth may make Singapore more vulnerable to external shocks. There is also the possibility of an increase in long-term capital outflow due to greater opportunities in member countries.

The above illustrate that FTAs have both positive and negative impacts on the Singapore economy. The government has put in place measures to mitigate the negative impacts and has been largely successful in reducing the problems of demand-pull inflation, structural unemployment and vulnerability to external shocks.

To tackle the threat of demand-pull inflation due to the growth in exports and investment, as well as the threat of imported inflation, the Singapore government has put in place an exchange rate policy of gradually appreciating the Singapore Dollar. A gradual appreciation of the Singapore Dollar keeps the price of imports relatively low, reducing the possibility of imported inflation. A gradual appreciation of the Singapore Dollar also prevents excessive increases in export demand and hence aggregate demand, reducing demand-pull inflation.

To tackle structural unemployment, Singapore has adopted manpower policies to equip workers with the skills required to work in the newly created industries, for instance biotechnology. The government also spearheads Research & Development (R&D) projects to develop new areas of growth and new dynamic comparative advantage, such as the biomedical sector, in the face of the erosion of Singapore’s comparative advantage in an attempt to search for new markets.

The government uses supply side policies to deal with the third problem of vulnerability to external shocks. Singapore’s economic strategy is outward-oriented. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are encouraged to venture overseas to reduce the dependence of our current account on exports and hence, the Balance of Trade (BOT). With SMEs investing abroad, this will lead to an inflow in the current account in the long run. This helps to reduce the vulnerability of Singapore’s economy to changing global conditions.

There is evidence that the above policies have been successful. The exchange rate policy has been effective in keeping inflation at a consistently low and stable level. The government also managed to develop new high-value added industries such as biomedical and life sciences to replace jobs in the lower-skilled manufacturing sector, in which Singapore is rapidly losing its comparative advantage. The outward orientation policy has also proven to be effective in helping Singapore cope with changes in global conditions. However, it takes time for supply side policies to work. Thus, in the short run the drawbacks of FTAs appear to be large, but in the long run, the positive impact of FTAs outweighs the negative impact when the policies take effect.

In conclusion, the signing of FTAs brings about benefits and detriments. Nevertheless, the long-run benefits tend to outweigh the short-run drawbacks and the Singapore’s government policies to mitigate the negative effects of FTAs have been relatively successful. Singapore is a small economy with a lack of natural resources. It benefits from the removal of tariffs, as its demand for imports is inelastic. Domestic producers benefit from entry into the markets of its trading partners and consumer welfare increases as consumers are able to obtain lower cost goods produced by Singapore’s trading partners.  FTAs also encourage foreign direct investment and technology transfer from MNCs, which contribute towards economic development and growth of Singapore. The main negative impacts of FTAs are demand-pull inflation, structural unemployment and vulnerability to external shocks. These impacts have been mitigated by the exchange rate policy, supply side policy and outward orientation measures put in place by the Singapore government. The Singapore government continues to campaign for the setting up of FTAs as they seek new opportunities in emerging markets such as China, India, Russia, and Latin America.

JC Economics Essays - Tutor's Commentary:  Once again, note that the original was edited two-fold - first, to fit into this JC Economics Essay blogpost; second, to remove diagrams. It is well written and crafted, and was done professionally. Given that this essay was written professionally and not under examination conditions, if an Economics student could write about half the standard of this paper, he would get more than a decent grade. Having said that, the usual questions apply: how can I write an essay better? How can I improve on this paper? 

(b) To what extent is fiscal policy the most effective measure to lower the unemployment rate in Singapore? [15]

Singapore’s unemployment rate could surge to a 20-year high of 5 percent next year. This would be the highest level of unemployment since 1986.

Adapted from The Straits Times, February 2009

(b) To what extent is fiscal policy the most effective measure to lower the unemployment rate in Singapore? [15]

Fiscal policy is the use of government spending and taxes to affect the AD of an economy in order to pursue the macroeconomic goals of governments. In the case of unemployment, expansionary fiscal policy can be used – where the government increases government spending and lowers taxes (both personal income and corporate) in order to boost AD. This essay argues that to a large extent, while fiscal policy has the potential to work in Singapore, it is not the most effective measure to lower the unemployment rate and there are many other measures which are more effective given Singapore’s context.

Fiscal policy

It is clear that on the one hand fiscal policy in theory can reduce cyclical unemployment. With an increase in government spending and lowering of income taxes and corporate taxes, C, I and G increase and thus AD shifts to the right. Due to the multiplier effect, real national income would increase, and as real output increases, there would be a need for more workers. This would overcome cyclical unemployment.

Also fiscal policy, if spent on infrastructure and other areas such as skills upgrading, can lead to solving structural unemployment. For instance, the Singapore government spends a lot of money on the Workforce Development Agency. If the fiscal policy is directed towards increasing the supply side (supply side policy), then the skills gap between workers and those required by industries might be solved and thus structural unemployment might not be a problem. Hence, fiscal policy does have some strengths and could be used as a viable policy.

Limitations of fiscal policy

On the other hand, there are limitations of fiscal policy given Singapore’s context. The multiplier effect is small, given Singapore’s high MPM and MPS (marginal propensity to import and save). Alternatively, it can be said that there are many leakages given Singapore’s context – as it is small and open. Also, a cut in taxes may lead to a small shift in C and I if there is widespread economic pessimism, and a reluctance to spend more money. In addition, there is a time lag effect where it takes a long time to formulate policies to decide on the appropriate tax cuts and which type of government spending to raise.

Other policies might work better

Furthermore, fiscal policy may not be the most effective policy to reduce cyclical unemployment. There are two other policies that might be able to reduce unemployment better in Singapore’s context. The first is exchange rate policy and the second is signing of new FTAs (Free Trade Agreements).

First, given that Singapore is a small and export oriented economy, where the total value of exports and imports comprise more than her GDP, an exchange rate policy could be implemented. In Singapore’s case, due to the classic trilemma, Singapore does not pursue monetary policy but instead pursues an exchange rate policy through the use of a managed float system (dirty floating). Depreciating the Singapore dollar would lead to an increase in (X-M) and thus increase real output and lower unemployment in Singapore by shifting AD to the right to the full employment level. At the same time it should also be noted that there is no perfect policy because cost push inflation could be a result of this exchange rate policy as the higher prices of imported raw materials into Singapore could lead to higher prices. Given that Singapore imports a lot of her raw materials and goods and services, this is a distinct possibility.

Second, by signing more FTAs Singapore has more access to international, foreign markets. This will help Singapore reduce her reliance on major trading partners if those countries experience recession. Thus, if X goes up, then AD will also increase, and thus cyclical unemployment will be lowered as the economy experiences actual growth if the FTAs are successful. On the other hand there are also search costs and increased competition with local producers in Singapore which might not be politically acceptable, and Singapore might also become more susceptible to external shocks to her economy.

Third, by increasing information available to workers, the government can reduce frictional unemployment. This is a simple solution that does not involve fiscal spending or exchange rates or FTAs, and should be used to reduce frictional unemployment.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the dominant cause of unemployment in Singapore is likely to be cyclical unemployment because the economy is dependent heavily on external markets, and therefore while fiscal policy can be used, it is not effective to a large extent, given the small multiplier effect. Given the changing dynamic comparative advantage of Singapore’s economy, it is imperative that policies to lower structural unemployment have to be considered seriously as well. In the final conclusion, both fiscal and other policies have to be used together to reduce the various types of unemployment in Singapore.

JC Economics Essays - Tutor's Commentary: This H2 Economics essay is also very well written, and addresses the question pertinently. The usual questions are: what can I do better, what I can improve on, and what have I learnt from reading this essay? This essay and the previous part were both very professionally written and specially designed and targeted specifically to answer the question. Yes, there can be alternative views, and there should be different approaches - but what is the strength of this approach? What have you learnt from here?

*PS I have had the sudden and rather zany idea that I should indeed try to make this site the most popular free Economics website for students reading the A levels ... and why not? I shall just do my best. Special thanks to my wonderful and encouraging students (you guys know who you are) who have complimented me on my Economics website. I will do my best. Cheers :) *