Free Trade Agreements (FTAs)
are highways that connect Singapore
to major economies and markets. With FTAs, Singapore-based exporters stand to
enjoy many benefits like tariff concessions, preferential access to certain
sectors, and faster entry into markets.
Analyse the impact of FTAs
on the Singapore
economy and assess the extent to which the impact of FTAs has been positive. [25m]
Note: The original essay was edited two-fold - first, to fit into this JC Economics Essay blog post; second, to remove diagrams/graphics. Hence it is entirely in verbal (English) form.
A Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is a legally-binding agreement to liberalise
trade and bring about closer economic integration between member countries.
FTAs aim to remove barriers to trade and investment and create a free flow of
goods, services, investment, and people. Under a FTA, member countries provide
each other with favourable treatment for goods, services, and investment. Such
favourable treatments include reduced tariffs, easier access to markets, and
opening up of various sectors for investment opportunities. Thus, FTAs help to
foster and facilitate the flow of trade and investment between Singapore
and its trading partners with the aim of achieving economic growth and
development. FTAs bring about both positive and negative impacts on the Singapore
economy. However, the government has implemented policies to mitigate these
negative impacts and the overall impact of FTAs on the Singapore economy is largely
positive.
The Singapore
economy is open to the world, in trade and investment. This openness to trade
is a necessity because of its small size and lack of natural resources.
Figure 1 illustrates the
effect of a tariff on imports. The original import expenditure for country A is
shown by area Oaeq0, the price of imports is Oa and the quantity of imports is
Oq0. For a country with price-elastic demand for imports, when the tariff is
imposed, the price of imports rises to Ob and
the quantity of imports fall to Oq1. Import expenditure is represented by area
Obfq1. There is a reduction in import expenditure as the fall in quantity
demanded of imports is greater than the rise in price of imports. For a country
with price-inelastic demand for imports, when the tariff is imposed, the price
of imports rises to Oc and the quantity of imports fall to Oq2. Import
expenditure is represented by area Ocdq2. There is an increase in import
expenditure as the fall in quantity demanded of imports is less than the
increase in price of imports.
This illustrates the positive impact of free trade on the Singapore economy and is one of the key reasons
why Singapore
campaigns actively for the removal of tariffs and the setting up of FTAs. It
has a relatively price-inelastic demand for imports since it has no natural
resources and has to import both food as well as inputs for production.
Imposing tariffs on such goods will have more adverse effects for its economy
than gains.
On the export side, domestic producers in Singapore gain from an enlarged
export market. Thus, they are able to reap internal economies of scale and earn
greater export revenue. In addition, the reduction, or removal, of tariffs
results in cheaper exports, which will lead to an increase in export demand and
revenue. The increase in net exports increases aggregate demand and in turn
increases national income, employment, and short-run growth if the economy is
operating below full employment. On the other hand, if the economy is near or
at full employment, the boost of net exports might lead to demand-pull
inflation.
The other benefit that FTAs bring to the Singapore economy is that it allows
countries to specialise in producing goods in which they have a comparative
advantage in to a greater extent. Comparative advantage is the idea that
relative opportunity costs of production must be taken into account when
trading between countries. Consumers benefit from lower-priced goods, as Singapore ’s
trading partners are able to produce these goods more efficiently due to their
comparative advantage. Also, there is both a greater variety of goods available
and better quality of products. The removal of tariffs means that domestic
producers face greater competition from foreign producers, which will boost the
efficiency of domestic production and the quality of products.
Lastly, Singapore
benefits from greater foreign direct investment. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)
refers to long-term capital inflows, which typically takes the form of a
Multinational Corporation (MNC) investing in an enterprise that is outside the
economy of the MNC. The greater inflow of capital will have a positive impact
on the Balance of Payment (BOP), creating a surplus in the BOP. Foreign direct
investment will also result in an increase in capital accumulation, which
increases the productive capacity of the economy and short-run economic growth.
In addition, the diffusion of technology from the MNCs to domestic producers
will increase the level of productivity and lead to long-run economic growth.
On the other hand, FTAs bring about negative impacts on the Singapore
economy. First, structural unemployment arises in industries that are in direct
competition with other lower-cost trading partners due to a loss of comparative
advantage. There will be a decline in
production levels and employment in some of Singapore ’s sectors such as
manufacturing. This results in structural unemployment, as these workers are
not equipped with the skills required to work in the newly-created sectors. In
addition, new technology increases the importance on skills and substitutes for
relatively low-skill inputs. Technology replaces low-skilled jobs, exacerbating
the problem of unemployment.
Second, FTAs cause member countries to become more vulnerable to external
events. FTAs foster closer trade links among member countries, and as a result
increases the interdependence of their economies. This means that a recession
in one country may quickly spread to other countries, which are its trading
partners, an effect known as the “contagion effect”. In the case of Singapore , higher reliance on imports makes the
economy more vulnerable to the threat of imported inflation, while reliance on
exports to drive economic growth may make Singapore more vulnerable to
external shocks. There is also the possibility of an increase in long-term
capital outflow due to greater opportunities in member countries.
The above illustrate that FTAs have both positive and negative impacts on
the Singapore
economy. The government has put in place measures to mitigate the negative
impacts and has been largely successful in reducing the problems of demand-pull
inflation, structural unemployment and vulnerability to external shocks.
To tackle the threat of demand-pull inflation due to the growth in exports
and investment, as well as the threat of imported inflation, the Singapore
government has put in place an exchange rate policy of gradually appreciating
the Singapore Dollar. A gradual appreciation of the Singapore Dollar keeps the
price of imports relatively low, reducing the possibility of imported
inflation. A gradual appreciation of the Singapore Dollar also prevents
excessive increases in export demand and hence aggregate demand, reducing
demand-pull inflation.
To tackle structural unemployment, Singapore has adopted manpower
policies to equip workers with the skills required to work in the newly created
industries, for instance biotechnology. The government also spearheads Research
& Development (R&D) projects to develop new areas of growth and new
dynamic comparative advantage, such as the biomedical sector, in the face of
the erosion of Singapore ’s
comparative advantage in an attempt to search for new markets.
The government uses supply side policies to deal with the third problem of
vulnerability to external shocks. Singapore ’s economic strategy is
outward-oriented. Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) are encouraged to venture
overseas to reduce the dependence of our current account on exports and hence,
the Balance of Trade (BOT). With SMEs investing abroad, this will lead to an
inflow in the current account in the long run. This helps to reduce the
vulnerability of Singapore ’s
economy to changing global conditions.
There is evidence that the above policies have been successful. The
exchange rate policy has been effective in keeping inflation at a consistently
low and stable level. The government also managed to develop new high-value
added industries such as biomedical and life sciences to replace jobs in the
lower-skilled manufacturing sector, in which Singapore is rapidly losing its
comparative advantage. The outward orientation policy has also proven to be
effective in helping Singapore
cope with changes in global conditions. However, it takes time for supply side
policies to work. Thus, in the short run the drawbacks of FTAs appear to be
large, but in the long run, the positive impact of FTAs outweighs the negative
impact when the policies take effect.
In conclusion, the signing of FTAs brings about benefits and detriments.
Nevertheless, the long-run benefits tend to outweigh the short-run drawbacks
and the Singapore ’s
government policies to mitigate the negative effects of FTAs have been
relatively successful. Singapore
is a small economy with a lack of natural resources. It benefits from the
removal of tariffs, as its demand for imports is inelastic. Domestic producers
benefit from entry into the markets of its trading partners and consumer
welfare increases as consumers are able to obtain lower cost goods produced by Singapore ’s
trading partners. FTAs also encourage
foreign direct investment and technology transfer from MNCs, which contribute
towards economic development and growth of Singapore . The main negative
impacts of FTAs are demand-pull inflation, structural unemployment and
vulnerability to external shocks. These impacts have been mitigated by the
exchange rate policy, supply side policy and outward orientation measures put
in place by the Singapore
government. The Singapore government continues to campaign for the setting up
of FTAs as they seek new opportunities in emerging markets such as China,
India, Russia, and Latin America.
JC Economics Essays - Tutor's Commentary: Once again, note that the original was edited two-fold - first, to fit into this JC Economics Essay blogpost; second, to remove diagrams. It is well written and crafted, and was done professionally. Given that this essay was written professionally and not under examination conditions, if an Economics student could write about half the standard of this paper, he would get more than a decent grade. Having said that, the usual questions apply: how can I write an essay better? How can I improve on this paper?